Germany: Status of Cancer Pain and Palliative Care
Michael Strumpf, MD, Michael Zenz, MD, and Barbara Donner, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy
University Clinic - Bergmannsheil
Bochum (Germany)
Reprint from the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,
Vol. 12 No. 2, August 1996
Epidemiology of cancer pain in Germany
Every cancer desease in Germany has to be included in a cancer
desease register. In this register every information on the
cancer itself, the progression, treatment, side effects are
documented. But there is not even the word "pain" in
any of these registers. The same is true for the criterion "quality
of life". This lack of documentation leads to a lack of
awareness about cancer pain and concomitant quality of life.
If doctors were obliged to ask every patient, whether there
is any concern of pain, the logical consequence would be to
answer any question about the treatment of this pain and to
improve the treatment efforts. Consequently, we can in Germany
exactly give figures on different cancers but no exact figures
on the incidence of pain in cancer.
Situation of palliative care
In Germany we have 216 hospices, which here work primarily on
an outpatient basis. The physicians responsible for pain therapy
in these institutions are the home physicians and they are
not specifically trained in pain therapy or palliative care.
So, a continuous and qualified pain treatment is not provided
in these hospices. They are not to compare with the english
or american hospices. In contrast to these outpatient and not
hospital-bound hospices 26 palliative care units exist in hospitals
distributed on the entire area of Germany (1). 16 institutions
are supporte d by grants of the Ministry of Health and 3 by
grants of iDeutsche Krebshilfei. A total number of 230 beds
are provided. The need of palliative care beds has been accounted
for about 4.000 in Germany to relate 10 beds to 200.000 inhabitants.
So, the actual lack in Germany is 3770 beds. However, the situation
has improved significantly over the last 6 years (2). An analysis
of 16 palliative care units indicate that the most prominent
reason to hospitalization was pain. A pain relief was achieved
in 84 % of the cases. 16 % of the patients had the same pain
or even more at the end of therapy. Certainly, these result
can be improved as compared to other international data.
Availability of opioids
Weak opioids like codeine, dihydrocodeine, tramadol, or dextropropoxyphene
are freely available on normal prescriptions. They are widely
used for cancer and non-cancer pain (54.7 million defined daily
dosages -DDD- per year). Whereas the total prescriptions of
analgesics (opioids and non-opioids) decreased by 26 %, the
prescription of weak opioids increased. In contrast to 54.7
million DDD of weak opioids only 9.6 million DDD of strong
opioids were prescribed. This is 15 % of all opioids (3). Strong
opioids like morphine or methadone are in Germany prescribed
on triplicate prescription forms.
| |
P R E S C R P T I O N F O R
M O R P H I N E
I N G E R M A N Y
--------------------------------------
|
|
| |
Special prescriptions
Triplicate prescriptions
Governmental control
Time limit (days)
Maximum daily dosage (mg)
Maximum dosage for 30 days (mg)
Possible punishment
Maximum amount (DM)
|
+
+
+
30
2000
20000
+
50000
|
| |
|
|
Barriers to effective cancer pain management
Treatment of chronic paini is a topic in the medical examination.
But neither pain therapy nor palliative care is taught in german
medical schools as a compulsory subject. Knowledge and education
in pain therapy is up to the personal efforts of every physician
in Germany. The most severe obstruction is the german opioid
legislation regulating the prescription of strong opioids.
Limits exist for the total amount of opioids, the daily amount,
the duration of every priscription. These limits have been
eased over the last years in certain steps. But limitations
still exist suggesting that opioid use is dangerous. Our national
health authorities support prejudices about strong opioids
by imposing restrictive laws with marginal changes in legislation
(Table 1). A questionnaire to the physicians of Bochum, Germany,
demonstrated the following results: 54 % of the physicians
stated the last opioid legislation change as an ease, but only
10 % changed their prescribing by this ease. 95 % of the doctors
said they had no patients needing strong opioids. 30 % had
no special opioid-prescription-forms. Although the legislation
has been changed and eased 90 % of the physicians were not
willing to increase prescribing of strong opioids (4). These
results are coincident with earlier investigations indicating
a severe undertreatment of cancer pain. Only 2 % of 16,630
cancer patients received an opioid prescription in a period
of 3 years (5). But there must be additional barriers to effective
cancer pain treatment, where the reasons are hard to explain.
Analysing the data from our pain clinic cancer patients waited
more than 2 years with pain, consulted more than 5 different
physicians and had more than 60 inpatient days before consulting
our pain clinic (6). These results are similar to those from
other pain clinics (7).
Programs in Germany
As mentioned above 16 palliative care wards are supported by
the government. Other programs do not exist as far as we know.
In contrast, many programs on cancer diagnosis, prophylaxis
and treatment are supported, whereas cancer pain plays a minor
role in the official support. In 1995 a program has been started
to publish and distribute guidelines for cancer pain therapy
from the Ministry of Health in cooperation with the chamber
of physicians. These guidelines have been developed on the
basis of the old WHO guidelines and closely resemble their
contents. It is hard to understand, why the Ministry did not
just distribute the WHO guidelinesalready some years ago but
developed own ones last year. The WHO should directly contact
the national governments to increase the knowledge about the
existing guidelinÖes and to prevent from national guidelines
which possibly are not in accordance with the WHO ones. On
the basis of the special german guidelines and others on headache
and back pain the government has reserved grants for research
with a total amount of 15 million DM. Although this amount
seams to be minimal related to the extent of the problem, it
has to be stated that for the first time in Germany the government
has accepted chronic pain as a problem to support in clinical
practice. The results of this 5-year-program are planned to
conclude into general german guidelines for therapy of chronic
cancer pain, headache and back pain.
Future developments
The major medical societies of Germany have recently been assembled
to the German interdisciplinary society for pain therapyi with
the goal to increase every societyis effort in improving the
quality of education pain treatment and to develnope common
rules for this education. As a result of these long lasting
attempts at improving the quality of pain therapy an offical
diploma ipain therapyi is going to be introduced in Germany.
This diploma shall be open for every specialist phyicians,
e. g. neurologist, anesthesiologist, oncologist etc. It demands
a practical and theoretical training in specialized pain diagnosis
and therapy over a period of 1 year, a theoretical interdisciplinary
course and an examination. In this way the future development
in pain therapy will improve in qualitative and quantitative
respects in Germany.
References
1. Radbruch L: Personal communication
2. Zenz M. Germany: Status of Cancer Pain and Palliative Care.
J Pain Symp Manage 1993;8: 416-418
3. Schmidt G. Analgetika. In: Schwabe U, Paffrath D, eds. Arzneiverordnungs-Report
95. Stuttgart Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1995: 29-41
4. Willweber-Strumpf A, Zenz M, Strumpf
M: Verschreibung von BtM-pflichtigen Analgetika durch Bochumer
niedergelassene Ärzte.
Der Schmerz 1993;7: S 53
5. Zenz M, Zenz Th, Tryba M, Strumpf M: Severe Undertreatment
of Cancer Pain: A 3-Year Survey of the German Situation. J Pain
Symp Manage 1995;10: 187-191
6. Strumpf M, Zenz M, Willweber-Strumpf:
Analyse der Therapie chronischer Schmerzen. Anästhesist
1993;42:169-174
7. Grond S, Zech D, Dahmann H, Schug SA,
Stobbe B, Lehmann KA: Überweisungsgrund: "therapieresistente" Tumorschmerzen.
Der Schmerz 1990;4: 193-200
Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Michael Zenz
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy
University Clinic - Bergmannsheil
Buerkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1
D-44789 Bochum (Germany)
Tel. ++49 234 302 6825
Fax ++49 234 302 6834
Supported in part by grants from Mundipharma GmbH and Purdue
Frederick
|